Cyberwarfare in India
Cyberwarfare in India
A high profile cyber attack on 12 July 2012 breached the email
accounts of about 12,000 people, including those of officials from the Ministry of External Affairs, Ministry of Home Affairs, Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), and the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP). A government-private sector plan being overseen by National Security Advisor (NSA) Shivshankar Menon
began in October 2012, and intends to beef up India's cyber security
capabilities in the light of a group of experts findings that India
faces a 470,000 shortfall of such experts despite the country's
reputation of being an IT and software powerhouse.
In February 2013, Information Technology Secretary J. Satyanarayana stated that the NCIIPC[page needed]
was finalizing policies related to national cyber security that would
focus on domestic security solutions, reducing exposure through foreign
technology.
Other steps include the isolation of various security agencies to
ensure that a synchronised attack could not succeed on all fronts and
the planned appointment of a National Cyber Security Coordinator. As of
that month, there had been no significant economic or physical damage to
India related to cyber attacks.
Cyberwarfare in China
Cyberwarfare in China
While China continues to be held responsible for a string of
cyber-attacks on a number of public and private institutions in the
United States, India, Russia, Canada, and France, the Chinese government
denies any involvement in cyber-spying campaigns. The administration
maintains the position that China is not the threat but rather the
victim of an increasing number of cyber-attacks. Most reports about
China's cyber warfare capabilities have yet to be confirmed by the Chinese government.
According to Fritz, China has expanded its cyber capabilities and military technology by acquiring foreign military technology. Fritz states that the Chinese government uses "new space-based surveillance and intelligence gathering systems, Anti-satellite weapon,
anti-radar, infrared decoys, and false target generators" to assist in
this quest, and that they support their "informationization" of the
their military through "increased education of soldiers in cyber
warfare; improving the information network for military training, and
has built more virtual laboratories, digital libraries and digital
campuses.
Through this informationization, they hope to prepare their forces to
engage in a different kind of warfare, against technically capable
adversaries. Many recent news reports link China's technological capabilities to the beginning of a new ‘cyber cold war.’
Ethics of Cyber Conflict
Ethics of Cyber Conflict
The
deployment of cyber conflicts as part of a state’s defensive or offensive
strategy is a fast growing phenomenon, which is rapidly changing the dynamics
of combat as well as the role that warfare plays in political negotiations and
the life of civil societies. Such changes are not the exclusive concern of the
military, for they also have a bearing on ethicists and policymakers, since
existing ethical theories of war, together with national and international
regulations, struggle to address the novelties of this phenomenon.
The issue
could not be more pressing and there is a much felt and fast escalating need to
share information and coordinate ethical theorising about cyber conflicts.
Contributions to the workshop will address issues concerning the way ICTs are
affecting our ethical views of conflicts and warfare, as well as the analysis
of just-war principles in the light of the dissemination of cyber conflicts;
humanitarian military interventions based on ICTs; whether preventive acts of
cyber war may satisfy jus-ad-bellum criteria; challenges of upholding
jus-in-bello standards in cyber warfare, especially in asymmetric conflicts;
attribution and proportionality of the response to cyber attacks; moral
permissibility of automated responses and ethical deployment of military
robotic weapons.
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)